Billboard Ads

Skoda Karoq vs Mazda CX-30: Which compact SUV is better? Design, comfort and price in direct comparison

Among the compact SUVs, both the Skoda Karoq and the Mazda CX-30 are among the perennial favorites. We take a closer look at both cars in a direct comparison. Which SUV suits you better?

The Skoda Karoq and the Mazda CX-30 are among the most popular compact SUVs on the German market. Both vehicles offer numerous advantages, but they appeal to different buyers' needs. In this article, we'll take an in-depth look at the two models and compare them in different areas such as value for money, engineering, design, and driving characteristics.

Skoda Karoq Front

Get your Skoda Karoq from €26,976

Mazda CX-30 Front

Get your Mazda CX-30 from €24,335

Price and features: Skoda Karoq vs. Mazda CX-30

Skoda Karoq

Skoda Karoq dynamic front

  • List pricefrom € 33,930
  • Engines: Petrol, Diesel
  • Carwow offer price: € 26,977
  • Features: The Karoq scores with a very good price-performance ratio. Even in the basic version, it offers many amenities such as an 8-inch infotainment system, a digital cockpit, as well as modern driver assistance systems such as lane departure warning and emergency brake assist. In higher trim levels, the Karoq offers additional features such as heated leather seats, matrix LED headlights or an inductive charging box for your mobile phone.

Lease a Skoda Karoq from €149/month

Mazda CX-30

Mazda CX-30 dynamic

  • List pricefrom € 27,990
  • Engines: Gasoline
  • Carwow offer price: from € 24,336
  • Equipment: The Mazda CX-30 starts cheaper than the Skoda Karoq, but offers a similar amount of equipment in the basic version. To get started, there is a 10.25-inch display, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and manual air conditioning, among other things. In higher trim levels, more luxurious features such as a power tailgate, head-up display or a Bose sound system are also available here.

Lease a Mazda CX-30 from €189/month

The Skoda Karoq offers extensive standard equipment at an attractive price. For the Mazda CX-30, the list price starts lower, but the basic equipment does not have to hide from the Skoda. Mazda also offers more choice in terms of equipment lines, but the Skoda also has diesel engines on offer.

especially compared to higher-quality equipment of the Mazda CX-30, which is somewhat more sparsely equipped in the entry-level version.

Design and interior: Skoda Karoq vs. Mazda CX-30

Skoda Karoq

Skoda Karoq Cockpit

The Karoq follows Skoda's traditional, functional design – practical yet modern. The interior design is clearly structured, with well-made plastic and a generous amount of space. Particularly noteworthy is the high trunk volume of up to 521 liters (with upright seats), which makes the Karoq the ideal vehicle for families or for longer trips.

Read the Skoda Karoq review

Mazda CX-30

Mazda CX-30 Cockpit

The Mazda CX-30 stands out with its sporty, emotional design. The interior is also well made, but Mazda relies on a more elegant and appealing design with high-quality materials. Particularly noteworthy is the high quality of workmanship and the modern infotainment system. The trunk volume of 422 liters is slightly smaller than the Karoq, but offers enough space for everyday use.

Read the Mazda CX-30 review

If you prefer a practical, spacious SUV, the Skoda Karoq is a better choice. However, if you want a sportier, more aesthetically pleasing design, the Mazda CX-30 is the ideal choice.

Driving characteristics: Skoda Karoq vs. Mazda CX-30

Skoda Karoq

Skoda Karoq dynamic rear

The Skoda Karoq offers a balanced ride with a high level of comfort, especially on long journeys. The steering is direct, and the suspension ensures a comfortable ride, even on rough roads. The optional all-wheel drive versions offer additional grip and make the Karoq a reliable companion even on more difficult terrain.

Configure your Skoda Karoq now

Mazda CX-30

Mazda CX-30 dynamic rear

The Mazda CX-30 scores with its sporty driving dynamics. The chassis is firmer, which gives the vehicle a more agile driving style. Especially in corners, the CX-30 shows high stability and precise steering. The ride feel is direct and has a sporty touch, making it appealing to drivers looking for a more dynamic driving experience.

Configure your Mazda CX-30 now

The Skoda Karoq offers a comfortable, balanced ride and is ideal for long distances and family. The Mazda CX-30, on the other hand, is sportier and appeals to drivers who prefer a more agile driving behavior.

Safety and assistance systems: Skoda Karoq vs. Mazda CX-30

Skoda Karoq

Skoda Karoq dynamic

The Karoq offers extensive safety equipment in all variants, including Front Assist (emergency brake assist), Lane Keeping Assist and Driver Fatigue Detection. Higher equipment also includes Park Steering Assist and adaptive cruise control.

Mazda CX-30

Mazda CX-30 static rear

The Mazda CX-30 is also well equipped in terms of safety. In addition to the usual assistance systems such as lane departure warning and emergency braking, it offers i-Activsense technology, which includes advanced functions such as safety spacers and blind spot warning.

Both models offer a high level of safety equipment, both already have a lot of safety features on board in the basic version, while the Mazda CX-30 offers a few additional technologies in higher trim levels.

Fuel consumption and efficiency: Skoda Karoq vs. Mazda CX-30

Skoda Karoq

  • Fuel consumption (combined): approx. 5.0-6.8 l/100 km (depending on engine)
  • The diesel variants of the Skoda Karoq are more economical in terms of consumption and generate the low consumption values

Mazda CX-30

  • Fuel consumption (combined): approx. 5.7-6.6 l/100 km (depending on engine)
  • The CX-30 is known for its efficient gasoline engines, but does not offer any alternatives with diesel or plug-in hybrids, for example

The Mazda CX-30 is slightly more efficient overall than the Skoda Karoq (with the exception of the diesels) in terms of fuel economy, making it particularly appealing to drivers with a focus on efficiency.

Fazit: Skoda Karoq vs. Mazda CX-30

Skoda Karoq: Der Karoq bietet hervorragenden Komfort, viel Platz und eine gute Ausstattung zu einem attraktiven Preis. Er ist ideal für Familien oder für alle, die viel Stauraum und eine ausgewogene Fahrweise suchen.

Skoda Karoq Modelle

Mazda CX-30: Der CX-30 ist die sportlichere Wahl. Er bietet einen agilen Fahrstil, ein elegantes Design und eine hohe Verarbeitungsqualität. Besonders für Fahrer, die eine dynamische Fahrt bevorzugen, ist er ideal.

Mazda CX-30 static rear 34

Both models are excellent, but depending on your priorities – whether it's comfort and space or sportiness and driving pleasure – there are clear recommendations. Choose the Skoda Karoq if you are looking for a practical, well-equipped and comfortable SUV. If, on the other hand, sporty driving and elegant design are important to you, then the Mazda CX-30 is the better choice.

If you don't have a preference in terms of comfort, suitability for everyday use or sportiness, then you should go for the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 offers you an equal offer to the Skoda for less money and is therefore a clear winner in our duel.

Mazda CX-30

Configure your Mazda CX-30 now from € 24,335

If neither of the two compact SUVs convinces you, you can take a look at our overview, where you will definitely find what you are looking for.

Find your new compact SUV

You want to change your car? Then sell your old vehicle directly to interested dealers via Carwow. You can find all the information on our overview of car sales.

Sell your old car!

Baca Juga
Posting Komentar